The previous Union minister additionally lauded the democratic method during which the committee functioned beneath the chairmanship of PP Chaudhuri for the previous 4 months.
The report was delayed by the panel as its former chairperson Meenakshi Lekhi was elevated a minister and a brand new chairperson of the committee was appointed.
The Private Information Safety Invoice, 2019 was referred to the Joint Committee of Parliament (JCP) for scrutiny earlier than it was taken up by Parliament for consideration and passage.
“Lastly, it’s accomplished. The Joint Committee of Parliament has adopted its report on the Private Information Safety Invoice, 2019. There are dissent notes, however that’s in one of the best spirit of parliamentary democracy. Sadly, such examples are few and much between beneath the Modi regime,” he stated after submitting his dissent be aware on the proposed laws.
The Congress chief stated he’s compelled to submit an in depth dissent be aware on the invoice as his options haven’t been accepted and he’s unable to persuade the members.
“However that ought to not detract from the democratic method during which the Committee has functioned. Now, for the controversy in Parliament,” he stated on Twitter.
Ramesh, who can also be the chief whip of the Congress social gathering in Rajya Sabha, in his dissent be aware stated he had advised amendments to Part 35, which is probably the most essential provision of the Invoice in addition to to Part 12.
He has argued that Part 35 offers nearly unbridled powers to the central authorities to exempt any authorities company from the whole Act itself.
“Underneath the modification I had advised, the central authorities should get Parliamentary approval for exempting any of its businesses from the purview of the legislation. Even then, the federal government should all the time adjust to the Invoice’s requirement of truthful and affordable processing and implementing the mandatory safety safeguards,” Ramesh stated.
“This could result in larger accountability and transparency, however even that was not discovered acceptable. Part 12(a)(i) creates sure exceptions for governments and authorities businesses from the provisions of consent.
Ramesh has in his dissent be aware stated that the JCP’s report permits a interval of two years for personal corporations emigrate to the brand new information safety regime, however governments and authorities businesses don’t have any such stipulation.
He argued that the design of the Private Information Safety Invoice, 2019 assumes that the constitutional proper to privateness arises solely the place operations and actions of personal corporations are involved.
Governments and authorities businesses are handled as a separate privileged class whose operations and actions are all the time within the public curiosity and particular person privateness concerns are secondary, the Congress chief stated.
“The concept that the August 2017 Puttaswamy judgment of the Supreme Court docket is related just for a really, very, very tiny part of the Indian inhabitants is, in my opinion, deeply flawed and troubling and is one which I completely reject,” he asserted in his be aware. PTI SKC Ok KJ