The main points have been sought by the excessive court docket pursuant to a route by the Supreme Court docket to all of the Excessive Courts to look at the “legality, propriety and bonafides” of withdrawals made after September 16, 2020, in instances referring to former and sitting legislators.
“Respondents (state authorities and police) are directed to furnish the main points of the legal instances withdrawn after September 16, 2020. Respondents are additional directed to furnish a consolidated assertion, explaining the explanations for withdrawal of the instances registered towards MPs/MLAs (sitting/former),” the excessive court docket mentioned.
With the route, the court docket listed the matter for listening to on January 5, 2022.
The apex court docket in August this 12 months had directed that prosecution towards the lawmakers underneath the Code of Legal Process (CrPC) can’t be withdrawn with out prior sanction from the respective excessive courts.
In its August 10 order, the apex court docket had directed that no prosecution towards a sitting or former MP/MLA shall be withdrawn with out the depart of the Excessive Court docket within the respective writ petitions registered on their very own pursuant to the Supreme Court docket order.
The Excessive Courts are requested to look at the withdrawals, whether or not pending or disposed of since September 16, 2020, in mild of pointers laid down by this court docket, the highest court docket had mentioned.
The order got here on a PIL of 2016 filed by lawyer and BJP chief Ashwini Upadhyay on fast-tracking of legal trials towards MP and MLAs in addition to in search of a life ban on convicted politicians from contesting polls.