in

UK’s ‘policy approach of fatalism’ early in pandemic was major error, lawmakers say By Reuters

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Food shopping is seen on the floor next to a social distancing sign and markings as a customer waits in a queue at a Spar supermarket, following the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Hemel Hempstead, Britain, April 24, 2020. RE

LONDON (Reuters) – The delay to England’s first coronavirus lockdown was a serious error based on groupthink that went unchallenged, lawmakers said in a report published on Tuesday, adding that failures in testing positive cases and tracing their contacts exacerbated the crisis.

Parliament’s health and science committees have jointly published a 150-page report on lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic after hours of testimony from more than 50 witnesses, include government policy, health and science advisers.

Deficiencies in the COVID-19 response in Britain have been laid out in a series of Reuters special reports, including about delays in the decision to lock down , shortcomings in the test and trace system and errors that led to the spread of the pandemic in care homes.

The lawmaker report highlighted concerns about all three, adding there was a “policy approach of fatalism” that sought to manage but not suppress COVID-19 infections in the early stages of the pandemic, which it described as a “serious error”.

“Our test and trace programme took too long to become effective. The Government took seriously scientific advice but there should have been more challenge from all to the early UK consensus that delayed a more comprehensive lockdown,” lawmakers Jeremy Hunt and Greg Clark, who led the committees behind the report, said.

Britain has reported 137,763 deaths within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 test result, the eighth highest coronavirus death toll in the world.

The report said the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines was well planned and executed, but warned that overall, lessons would need to be learned to avoid repeating mistakes, and recommended more focus on pandemic contingency planning.

“The UK’s response, with the notable exception of vaccine development and deployment, has for the most part been too reactive as opposed to anticipatory,” the report said.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.


What do you think?

Written by colin

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0

Why quitting your job is good for the economy

UK jobs hit record high ahead of September furlough expiry By Reuters